Zoom’s Fatal Flaw
In exchange for viral growth, the video conferencing startup left itself open to copycat competitors
Over the past couple of months, the coronavirus pandemic has led to a dramatic increase in the demand for remote work tools. Zoom has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of this shift, with daily active users growing from 10 million in the last quarter of 2019 to a staggering 200 million in the first quarter of 2020. This has also led to a surge of investor and startup activity in the remote workspace.
As an investor and adviser, I’ve received numerous questions lately about Zoom from entrepreneurs and other investors. The main question I receive is how strong are Zoom’s network effects? A network effect describes the increasing value of a product as more users begin to use it. Network effects tend to be one of the strongest forms of defensibility for a product because the presence of more users on the network helps prevent churn. In the case of platforms like Airbnb, a strong network effect creates defensibility by forcing rivals to challenge them at a much larger scale (in the case of Airbnb, on a global scale).
In other words, people were asking me if the new surge in user adoption on Zoom made it more a valuable product, which in turn made it more difficult for competitors to copy or…
